Chinese In North America(北美华人e网)

注册
发新话题 回复该主题

1#

我看了强东强奸起诉书两遍,我觉得起诉书暗示警方检方贪赃枉法

主要是三点,
1,司机明显目睹了性侵。原告明显准备用司机做为证人。但是警察和检察官肯定都没有采信司机的证词。
    30 ... The foregoing interaction, assault and battery, were witnessed by the chauffeur.
2,警察听到被告是个有钱名人后就把他给放了。没有采取任何措施。即使在原告明确说被强奸之后
    44. As soon as Defendant Liu was removed from her apartment, one of the police officers questioned the Plaintiff about what had happened. The Plaintiff told the law enforcement officer she had been raped by Defendant Liu. The Plaintiff told the interviewing officer that Defendant Liu is an internationally famous and wealthy person and is listed in Forbes Magazine.
    然后刘强东就莫名其妙地给放了。
3, 警察居然都不收集证据。证据都是原告自己收集的。
    45. The hospital employees also took possession of the Plaintiff's bedsheet and underwear so that those items could be logged into police evidence.

steve888 发表于 4/17/2019 10:26:44 PM 我看了强东强奸起诉书两遍,我觉得起诉书暗示警方检方贪赃枉法-1楼

警察来了之后,不是原告主动对警察说是场误会,警察才放过了强东吗?为啥现在说是原告当场告知警察被强奸了?
TOP
分享到微信 分享到Facebook 分享到Twitter 分享到新浪微博 复制到剪贴板
agree
3
disagree
9
2#



原告肯定没说误会。因为警察都戴着摄像头,这个说强奸有视频证据。


steve888 发表于 4/17/2019 11:00:52 PM 我看了强东强奸起诉书两遍,我觉得起诉书暗示警方检方贪赃枉法-2楼

这个可能性很少,如果这样,都可以起诉警察了。警察来抓强东,苦主告诉警察自己被强奸了,然后警察没抓强东就让对方走了?这说不过去啊。
TOP
agree
1
disagree
2
3#

主要是三点,
1,司机明显目睹了性侵。原告明显准备用司机做为证人。但是警察和检察官肯定都没有采信司机的证词。
    30 ... The foregoing interaction, assault and battery, were witnessed by the chauffeur.
2,警察听到被告是个有钱名人后就把他给放了。没有采取任何措施。即使在原告明确说被强奸之后
    44. As soon as Defendant Liu was removed from her apartment, one of the police officers questioned the Plaintiff about what had happened. The Plaintiff told the law enforcement officer she had been raped by Defendant Liu. The Plaintiff told the interviewing officer that Defendant Liu is an internationally famous and wealthy person and is listed in Forbes Magazine.
    然后刘强东就莫名其妙地给放了。
3, 警察居然都不收集证据。证据都是原告自己收集的。
    45. The hospital employees also took possession of the Plaintiff's bedsheet and underwear so that those items could be logged into police evidence.

https://www.google.com/search?q=27-cv-19-5911

http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Liu.pdf

再说一遍,不要相信以前的各种谣言误传,现在开始以起诉书为准。这些事实原告说有警察的body camera footage做为证据,有录像的事实,不可能胡说八道,否则直接输官司。


steve888 发表于 4/17/2019 10:26:44 PM 我看了强东强奸起诉书两遍,我觉得起诉书暗示警方检方贪赃枉法-3楼

真有闲啊。这么长的起诉书,还是法律英文,看了两遍。。。有这个时间家里烧烧饭带带小孩不好么?
TOP
agree
0
disagree
4
发新话题 回复该主题